Sexism of any kind is not Feminism
“Women are brave if they hit men. Men are evil, brutal perverts if they hit
women.”
False. Any violence
is wrong. Whether it is a man hitting a
woman, or a woman hitting a man. A man
hitting a woman is not wrong because men shouldn’t hit women; it’s wrong
because violence is wrong. Period. If a man defends himself against a violent
woman, that is understandable, in the same way that a woman defending herself
against a violent man is understandable.
“Women are romantic if they suddenly kiss men. Men are perverted if they suddenly kiss
women.”
Anyone suddenly kissing another person is creepy. Regardless of their genders. If a woman kisses a man because they’re into
one another, and she knows for a fact that he’s down, then there’s nothing
wrong with it. Same goes for a man. Without getting too much into the idea of
consent, if both parties are cool with getting physical, it doesn’t matter who
initiates, so long as it’s done with absolutely clarity regarding the other
person’s feelings.
“Women staring at men’s crotch it’s flirting. Men staring at women’s breasts it’s perverted
and offensive.”
Wrong. Anyone being
objectified or sexualized in this way is not cool. While I have a hard time thinking of how many
times a woman has stared at a man’s crotch as a way to flirt, I can think of
plenty of times men have stared at my tits.
But regardless, if a woman is making a man feel uncomfortable because of
the way she is speaking to him or looking at him, it is just as wrong as when a
man does this to a woman. Sexual harassment
is sexual harassment—again, doesn’t matter who the perpetrator is.
“Let’s split the bill!”
If a woman says this, she is independent. If a man says this, he is cheap.
Inaccurate again. If
a woman says this, it has not implications as to her independence. Maybe she’s cheap. Maybe she doesn’t feel comfortable with the
man paying for her bill since sometimes men think paying for dinner means they’re
gonna get laid. A woman wanting to pay
her bill has nothing to do with how independent she is. Assuming a woman is independent because she
wants to pay her bill is sexist—no one would question a man who wants to pay
his bill. I personally enjoy paying my
own bill when I can afford it. But if I
go out with men or women who want to cover me, then I’m totally cool with that
because I’m poor. And someone who
assumes a man is cheap because he wants to split the bill is also sexist,
because the thinking that a man has to pay for the whole meal is conventionally
gender-biased.
“It’s just a mistake if women go into the men’s
bathroom. Men are perverted if they go
into women’s bathroom.”
Notice that I’m not correcting the grammar for any of these
statements. Let’s consider for a moment
why there are separate bathrooms to begin with.
It’s kind of stupid, right? I won’t
get into a discussion about why the sexes have their own bathrooms, but I do
think bathrooms should be unisex. I
understand some women (and men) prefer to do their business with people of the
same sex. Fine. But I don’t care who uses what bathroom. If someone is going to piss or shit in a
bathroom, then why the fuck does it matter which one they use? Again, this picture does not illustrate feminism. It illustrates the kind of backwards thinking
that runs rampant in our culture. If
anyone goes into a restroom to peek in on the other patrons, then that is a
problem, regardless of gender!
“Women doing work: ‘Help me!’ Men doing work: It’s natural.”
What the fuck is this?
First of all, this example in and of itself is sexist. To assume that all women require help when
doing work is sexist. If a woman asks
for help, and a person assumes it is because she can’t do the job on her own,
that’s sexist. If a woman doesn’t ask
for help, then what does that make her?
Unnatural? What the hell is the
implication here? Men AND women doing
work is natural. Men AND women asking
for help is completely fine. What the
fuck does gender have to do with any of that?
(Man goes up to police officer) “She touched my crotch!” Police officer responds, “Meh, who cares?” (Woman goes up to police officer) “He touched
my breasts!” Man is handcuffed.
Unfortunately, there are cases of men who report sexual harassment
and abuse who are dismissed based upon the sheer fact that they are men. THIS IS SEXIST. If someone reports any kind of sexual
misconduct, then the perpetrator should be held accountable. Someone pointed out that women will claim
rape or that a man hit them in order to get a man into trouble, and that the
cops believe the woman because she is a woman.
This has so many implications, I don’t even know where to begin. First of all, statistically, it IS more
common for a man to be the perpetrator of domestic violence or rape. That does not mean that women do not commit
those crimes. But if you were to look at
the number of cases of sexual assault of any kind, and then look at how many of
them were in fact legitimate cases, it far outweighs the number of times someone
has cried wolf. But a woman using the
fact that she is a woman to get a man into trouble? That is NOT feminism. That’s NOT gender equality—it’s actually
STILL SEXIST. Because people assume that
in cases of domestic dispute, a man is responsible. That’s based upon gender bias. That’s based upon the idea that men are
brutes. That’s based upon the idea that
men beat women and it’s normal. How
fucking sad is that? For years nothing
was done about it. For years (and it
still happens, make no mistake), it was simply accepted that a man would
discipline his wife or girlfriend or what have you, and nobody said a goddamn
word, because that’s what it means to live in a patriarchal society. The fact some women lie does not erase
history. And it certainly doesn’t mean
that domestic violence of any kind is acceptable. All it means is that some PEOPLE don’t know
how to handle things very well, and they call the cops because they don’t know
how to approach the situation like mature and logical adults.
Gender equality does not mean treating women as
superior. It does not mean women can do
whatever the fuck they want. It does not
mean that they are always right. It does
not mean that men are evil, or perverts, or brutes, or the only sex responsible
for physical and sexual violence. Gender
equality means men and women deserve to be treated equally. The fact that women can manipulate the system
in order to get men into trouble is the result of sexism. The fact that there are people who think it
is okay for a woman to objectify a man is absurd! NO ONE should be objectified. NO ONE should worry about how they are judged
just because they happen to have a penis or a vagina. That’s equality. That’s gender equality. But I’m sure it’ll be another hundred years
before memes like this stop making their way around the internet.
Comments
Post a Comment